This document is an introduction to the excessmort package for analyzing time series count data. The packages was designed to help estimate excess mortality from weekly or daily death count data, but can be applied to outcomes other than death.
There are two main data types that the package works with:
If you start with record-level data, it is useful to also have a data frame with population sizes for groups of interest. The pacakge functions expect a population size estimate for each date.
As an example of record-level data we include the
cook-records
dataset.
sex | age | race | residenceplace | date | cause_1 | type_of_death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
male | 57 | white | Chicago | 2014-08-11 | NA | NA |
male | 78 | white | Forest Park | 2014-08-11 | Complications Of Closed Head Injury | Accident |
female | 87 | white | Oak Lawn | 2014-08-11 | Subdural Hematoma | Accident |
male | 26 | black | Chicago | 2014-08-11 | Multiple Gunshot Wounds | Homicide |
male | 64 | white | Chicago | 2014-08-11 | Gunshot Wound Of The Head | Suicide |
male | 54 | white | Chicago | 2014-08-11 | Hypertensive Cardiovascular Disease | Natural |
Note that this also loads a demographic data table:
sex | race | agegroup | date | population |
---|---|---|---|---|
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-11 | 10910 |
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-12 | 10910 |
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-13 | 10910 |
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-14 | 10910 |
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-15 | 10910 |
female | asian | 0-4 | 2014-08-16 | 10910 |
If you have record-level data, a first step in the analysis is to
convert it to count-level data. We provide the
compute_counts
function to help with this:
date | outcome |
---|---|
2014-08-11 | 11 |
2014-08-12 | 17 |
2014-08-13 | 15 |
2014-08-14 | 12 |
2014-08-15 | 17 |
2014-08-16 | 12 |
The demo
argument permits you to include demographic
information:
# -- Aggregating death counts and computing population size from demographic data
counts <- compute_counts(cook_records, demo = cook_demographics)
kable(counts[1:6,])
date | outcome | population |
---|---|---|
2014-08-11 | 11 | 5238216 |
2014-08-12 | 17 | 5238216 |
2014-08-13 | 15 | 5238216 |
2014-08-14 | 12 | 5238216 |
2014-08-15 | 17 | 5238216 |
2014-08-16 | 12 | 5238216 |
Note that the table provided to the demo
argument must
have population size for each date of interest. The function
approx_demographics
can interpolate yearly data into daily
data. The function get_demographics
can help you get data
directly from the Census. But it uses the tidycensus package which
requires a Census API. You can obtain one at http://api.census.gov/data/key_signup.html, and then
supply the key to the census_api_key
function to use it
throughout your tidycensus session.
The compute_counts
has a special argument to define
agegroups which you can use like this:
# -- Aggregating death counts and computing population size by age groups
counts <- compute_counts(cook_records, by = "agegroup", demo = cook_demographics,
breaks = c(0, 20, 40, 60, 80, Inf))
kable(counts[1:6,])
date | agegroup | outcome | population |
---|---|---|---|
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | 0 | 1301842 |
2014-08-11 | 20-39 | 2 | 1580255 |
2014-08-11 | 40-59 | 4 | 1370081 |
2014-08-11 | 60-79 | 4 | 801279 |
2014-08-11 | 80-Inf | 1 | 184759 |
2014-08-12 | 0-19 | 0 | 1301842 |
The breaks need to be a subset of the breaks used in the demographic data frame. The most commonly used breaks in demographic recordsare \(0, 5, 10, 15, \dots, 85, \infty\). You can also obtain counts for different demographics as long as they are included in the records-level data. A population size will be provided as long as the demographic variables match.
# -- Aggregating death counts and computing population size by age groups, race, and sex
counts <- compute_counts(cook_records, by = c("agegroup", "race", "sex"),
demo = cook_demographics,
breaks = c(0, 20, 40, 60, 80, Inf))
kable(counts[1:6,])
date | agegroup | race | sex | outcome | population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | asian | female | 0 | 38986 |
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | asian | male | 0 | 39911 |
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | asian | unknown | 0 | NA |
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | black | female | 0 | 161098 |
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | black | male | 0 | 162955 |
2014-08-11 | 0-19 | black | unknown | 0 | NA |
Count-level data are assumed to have at least three columns:
date
, outcome
and population
.
These exact names need to be used for some of the package functions to
work.
The package includes several examples of count-level data:
Dataset | Description |
---|---|
cdc_state_counts | Weekly death counts for each USA state |
icd (puerto_rico_icd) | Puerto Rico daily mortality by cause of death |
louisiana_counts | Louisiana daily mortality |
new_jersey_counts | New Jersey daily mortality |
puerto_rico_counts | Puerto Rico daily mortality |
puerto_rico_icd | Puerto Rico daily mortality by cause of death |
A first step in most analyses is to estimate the expected count. The
compute_expected
function does this. We do this by assuming
the counts \(Y_t\) are an overdispresed
Poisson random variable with expected value \[\begin{equation}
\mu_t = N_t \exp[\alpha(t) + s(t) + w(t)]
\end{equation}\] with \(N_t\)
the population at time \(t\), \(\alpha(t)\) a slow trend to account for the
increase in life expectancy we have seen in the last few decades, a
seasonal trend \(s(t)\) to account for
more deaths during the winter, and a day of the week effect \(w(t)\). Note that for weekly data we do not
need to include \(w(t)\).
Because we are often fitting this model to estimate the effect of a natural disaster or outbreak, we exclude dates with special events when estimating these parameters.
As an example, here we fit this model to Massachusetts weekly data from 2017 to 2020. We exclude the 2018 flu season and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.
# -- Dates to exclude when fitting the mean model
exclude_dates <- c(seq(make_date(2017, 12, 16), make_date(2018, 1, 16), by = "day"),
seq(make_date(2020, 1, 1), max(cdc_state_counts$date), by = "day"))
The compute_expected
function returns another count data
table but with expected counts included:
# -- Fitting mean model to data from Massachusetts
counts <- cdc_state_counts %>%
filter(state == "Massachusetts") %>%
compute_expected(exclude = exclude_dates)
## Warning in compute_expected(., exclude = exclude_dates): Including a trend in
## the model is not recommended with less than five years of data. Consider
## setting include.trend = FALSE.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 52 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 8.99.
state | date | outcome | outcome_unweighted | population | log_expected_se | expected | excluded |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Massachusetts | 2017-01-14 | 1310 | 1310 | 6843136 | 0.008 | 1265 | FALSE |
Massachusetts | 2017-01-21 | 1282 | 1282 | 6843830 | 0.008 | 1269 | FALSE |
Massachusetts | 2017-01-28 | 1239 | 1239 | 6844524 | 0.008 | 1271 | FALSE |
Massachusetts | 2017-02-04 | 1294 | 1294 | 6845217 | 0.007 | 1270 | FALSE |
Massachusetts | 2017-02-11 | 1262 | 1262 | 6845911 | 0.007 | 1266 | FALSE |
Massachusetts | 2017-02-18 | 1378 | 1378 | 6846605 | 0.007 | 1260 | FALSE |
You can make a quick plot showing the expected and observed data
using the expected_plot
function:
# -- Visualizing weekly counts and expected counts in blue
expected_plot(counts, title = "Weekly Mortality Counts in MA")
You can clearly see the effects of the COVID-19 epidemic. The dispersion parameter is saved as an attribute:
## [1] 1.36
If you want to see the estimated components of the mean model you can
use the keep.components
argument:
# -- Fitting mean model to data from Massachusetts and retaining mean model componentss
res <- cdc_state_counts %>% filter(state == "Massachusetts") %>%
compute_expected(exclude = exclude_dates,
keep.components = TRUE)
## Warning in compute_expected(., exclude = exclude_dates, keep.components =
## TRUE): Including a trend in the model is not recommended with less than five
## years of data. Consider setting include.trend = FALSE.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 52 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 8.99.
Then, you can explore the trend and seasonal component with the
expected_diagnostic
function:
Once we have estimated \(\mu(t)\) we can proceed to fit a model that accounts for natural disasters or outbreaks:
\[ Y_t \mid \varepsilon_t \sim \mbox{Poisson}\left\{ \mu_t \right[1 + f(t) \left] \varepsilon_t \right\} \mbox{ for } t = 1, \dots,T \]
with \(T\) the total number of observations, \(\mu_t\) the expected number of deaths at time \(t\) for a typical year, \(100 \times f(t)\) the percent increase at time \(t\) due to an unusual event, and \(\varepsilon_t\) a time series of, possibly auto-correlated, random variables representing natural variability.
The function excess_model
fits this. We can supply the
output compute_expected
or we can start directly from the
count table and the expected counts will be computed:
# -- Fitting excess model to data from Massachusetts
fit <- cdc_state_counts %>%
filter(state == "Massachusetts") %>%
excess_model(exclude = exclude_dates,
start = min(.$date),
end = max(.$date),
knots.per.year = 12,
verbose = FALSE)
## Warning in compute_expected(counts, exclude = exclude, include.trend =
## include.trend, : Including a trend in the model is not recommended with less
## than five years of data. Consider setting include.trend = FALSE.
The start
and end
arguments determine what
dates the model is fit to.
We can quickly see the results using
# -- Visualizing deviations from expected mortality in Massachusetts
excess_plot(fit, title = "Deviations from Expected Mortality in MA")
The function returns dates in which a above normal rate was estimated:
## start end obs_death_rate exp_death_rate sd_death_rate observed
## 1 2017-12-30 2018-01-27 10.0 9.54 0.1201 6636
## 2 2020-03-21 2020-06-13 13.1 8.47 0.0701 22657
## 3 2020-10-17 2021-02-20 10.3 9.01 0.0597 25941
## 4 2021-07-24 2021-09-18 8.6 7.94 0.0814 10294
## expected excess sd fitted se
## 1 6301 335 79.4 373 84.7
## 2 14616 8041 120.9 8174 112.3
## 3 22731 3210 150.8 3204 161.1
## 4 9497 797 97.5 743 104.6
We can also compute cumulative deaths from this fit:
# -- Computing excess deaths in Massachusetts from March 1, 2020 to May 9, 2020
cumulative_deaths <- excess_cumulative(fit,
start = make_date(2020, 03, 01),
end = make_date(2020, 05, 09))
# -- Visualizing cumulative excess deaths in MA
cumulative_deaths %>%
ggplot(aes(date)) +
geom_ribbon(aes(ymin = observed- 2*sd, ymax = observed + 2*sd), alpha = 0.5) +
geom_line(aes(y = observed),
color = "white",
size = 1) +
geom_line(aes(y = observed)) +
geom_point(aes(y = observed)) +
scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::comma) +
labs(x = "Date",
y = "Cumulative excess deaths",
title = "Cumulative Excess Deaths in MA",
subtitle = "During the first wave of Covid-19")
## Warning: Using `size` aesthetic for lines was deprecated in ggplot2 3.4.0.
## ℹ Please use `linewidth` instead.
## This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
We can also use this function to obtain excess deaths for specific
intervals by supplying intervals
instead of
start
and end
# -- Intervals of interest
intervals <- list(flu = seq(make_date(2017, 12, 16), make_date(2018, 2, 10), by = "day"),
covid19 = seq(make_date(2020, 03, 14), max(cdc_state_counts$date), by = "day"))
# -- Getting excess death statistics from the excess models for the intervals of interest
cdc_state_counts %>%
filter(state == "Massachusetts") %>%
excess_model(exclude = exclude_dates,
interval = intervals,
verbose = FALSE)
## Warning in compute_expected(counts, exclude = exclude, include.trend =
## include.trend, : Including a trend in the model is not recommended with less
## than five years of data. Consider setting include.trend = FALSE.
## start end obs_death_rate exp_death_rate sd_death_rate
## flu 2017-12-16 2018-02-10 9.76 9.49 0.1044
## covid19 2020-03-14 2021-09-25 9.58 8.43 0.0327
## observed expected excess sd
## flu 11610 11290 320 124
## covid19 103019 90746 12273 352
With daily data we recommend using a model that accounts for
correlated data. You can do this by setting the model
argument to "correlated"
. We recommend exploring the data
to see if a day of the week effect is needed and if it is included with
the argument weekday.effect = TRUE
.
To fit this model we need a contiguous interval of dates with \(f=0\) to estimate the correlation structure. This interval should not be too big (default limit is 5,000 data points) as it will slow down the estimation procedure.
We demonstrate this with data from Puerto Rico. These data are provided for each age group:
## # A tibble: 6 × 5
## date sex agegroup outcome population
## <date> <chr> <fct> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1985-01-01 female 0-4 1 159829.
## 2 1985-01-01 female 5-9 1 160248.
## 3 1985-01-01 female 10-14 0 168104.
## 4 1985-01-01 female 15-19 0 169342.
## 5 1985-01-01 female 20-24 0 146202.
## 6 1985-01-01 female 25-29 0 130396.
We start by collapsing the dataset into bigger agegroups using the
collapse_counts_by_age
functions:
# -- Aggregating data by age groups
counts <- collapse_counts_by_age(puerto_rico_counts,
breaks = c(0, 5, 20, 40, 60, 75, Inf)) %>%
group_by(date, agegroup) %>%
summarize(population = sum(population),
outcome = sum(outcome)) %>%
ungroup()
## `summarise()` has grouped output by 'date'. You can override using the
## `.groups` argument.
In this example we will only use the oldest agegroup:
# -- Subsetting data; only using the data from the oldest group
counts <- filter(counts, agegroup == "75-Inf")
To fit the model we will exclude several dates due to hurricanes, dubious looking data, and the Chikungunya epidemic:
# -- Hurricane dates and dates to exclude when fitting models
hurricane_dates <- as.Date(c("1989-09-18","1998-09-21","2017-09-20"))
hurricane_effect_ends <- as.Date(c("1990-03-18","1999-03-21","2018-03-20"))
names(hurricane_dates) <- c("Hugo", "Georges", "Maria")
exclude_dates <- c(seq(hurricane_dates[1], hurricane_effect_ends[1], by = "day"),
seq(hurricane_dates[2], hurricane_effect_ends[2], by = "day"),
seq(hurricane_dates[3], hurricane_effect_ends[3], by = "day"),
seq(as.Date("2014-09-01"), as.Date("2015-03-21"), by = "day"),
seq(as.Date("2001-01-01"), as.Date("2001-01-15"), by = "day"),
seq(as.Date("2020-01-01"), lubridate::today(), by = "day"))
We pick the following dates to estimate the correlation function:
# -- Dates to be used for estimation of the correlated errors
control_dates <- seq(as.Date("2002-01-01"), as.Date("2013-12-31"), by = "day")
We are now ready to fit the model. We do this for 4 intervals of interest:
# -- Denoting intervals of interest
interval_start <- c(hurricane_dates[2],
hurricane_dates[3],
Chikungunya = make_date(2014, 8, 1),
Covid_19 = make_date(2020, 1, 1))
# -- Days before and after the events of interest
before <-c(365, 365, 365, 548)
after <-c(365, 365, 365, 90)
For this model we can include a discontinuity which we do for the hurricanes:
# -- Indicating wheter or not to induce a discontinuity in the model fit
disc <- c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE)
We can fit the model to these 4 intervals as follows:
# -- Fitting the excess model
f <- lapply(seq_along(interval_start), function(i){
excess_model(counts,
event = interval_start[i],
start = interval_start[i] - before[i],
end = interval_start[i] + after[i],
exclude = exclude_dates,
weekday.effect = TRUE,
control.dates = control_dates,
knots.per.year = 12,
discontinuity = disc[i],
model = "correlated")
})
## Computing expected counts.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 365 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 71.4.
## Order selected for AR model is 14. Estimated residual standard error is 0.053.
## Computing expected counts.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 365 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 71.4.
## Order selected for AR model is 14. Estimated residual standard error is 0.053.
## Computing expected counts.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 365 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 71.4.
## Order selected for AR model is 14. Estimated residual standard error is 0.053.
## Computing expected counts.
## No frequency provided, determined to be 365 measurements per year.
## Overall death rate is 71.4.
## Order selected for AR model is 14. Estimated residual standard error is 0.053.
We can examine the different hurricane effects.
This is Maria:
# -- Visualizing deviations in mortality for Hurricane Maria
excess_plot(f[[2]], title = names(interval_start)[2])
You can also see the results for Georges, Chikungunya, and COVID-19 affected periods with the following code (graphs not shown to keep vignette size small)“:
excess_plot(f[[1]], title = names(interval_start)[1])
excess_plot(f[[3]], title = names(interval_start)[3])
excess_plot(f[[4]], title = names(interval_start)[4])
We can compare cumulative deaths like this:
# -- Calculating excess deaths for 365 days after the start of each event
ndays <- 365
cumu <- lapply(seq_along(interval_start), function(i){
excess_cumulative(f[[i]],
start = interval_start[i],
end = pmin(make_date(2020, 3, 31), interval_start[i] + ndays)) %>%
mutate(event_day = interval_start[i], event = names(interval_start)[i])
})
cumu <- do.call(rbind, cumu)
# -- Visualizing cumulative excess deaths
cumu %>%
mutate(day = as.numeric(date - event_day)) %>%
ggplot(aes(color = event,
fill = event)) +
geom_ribbon(aes(x = day,
ymin = fitted - 2*se,
ymax = fitted + 2*se),
alpha = 0.25,
color = NA) +
geom_point(aes(day, observed),
alpha = 0.25,
size = 1) +
geom_line(aes(day, fitted, group = event),
color = "white",
size = 1) +
geom_line(aes(day, fitted)) +
scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::comma) +
labs(x = "Days since the start of the event",
y = "Cumulaive excess deaths",
title = "Cumulative Excess Mortality",
color = "",
fill = "")